who is alan cumming dating - Radiometric dating problem
Author: By Curt Sewell“How can creationists expect people to accept a young earth when science has proved through radiometric dating that the earth is billions of years old?” This article addresses that question, which represents the thinking of a large number of people today.
Most people, even the experts in the field, forget the assumptions on which radiometric dating is based.
Radioactive Dating There are basically two different kinds of radioactive dating methods.
Between 19 several teams made a number of radiometric measurements, and the results clustered around three ages-1.8 MY, 2.4 MY, and 2.6 MY.
Each team criticized the others’ techniques of rock sample selection.
Nontechnical readers can skip the box-figures, however, without losing much.
Experimental Errors The methods that give ancient ages produce almost as many “wrong” answers as “right” ones.It furnishes some good evidences that creationists often use.But we won’t discuss the C-14 method in this article.And, of course, the public doesn’t usually hear of these wrong answers.This statement – that radiometric dates are “corrected” by reference to evolution-based index fossils – is hotly contested, but examination of the technical literature shows that it is true, in spite of what elementary textbooks say. Documented Discrepancies The general public believes that radiometric results are consistent and thus demonstrably reliable. John Woodmorappe did an extensive literature search, looking at 445 technical articles from 54 reputable geochronology and geology journals.1 These reports listed over 350 dates, measured by radiometric methods, that conflicted badly with the ages assigned to fossils found in these same strata.Certainly the majority of scientists accept radiometric dating.Tags: Adult Dating, affair dating, sex dating