bbw swingers dating uk - Helioseismic dating

This was the session that contained the presentation.Notice that the presentation numbers go from “4” to “6,” skipping “5,” which was the presentation on carbon-14 in dinosaur bones.As a result, it is always possible that they are not as reliable as they seem.

One of the more recent developments is the carbon dating of bones and other carbon-containing materials that are supposedly millions of years old.

Carbon dating uses the radioactive decay of carbon-14 into nitrogen-14, which currently has a half-life of 5,730 years.

Fourth, the amount of carbon in the vicinity of the fossil decreased as you moved away from the fossil.

This indicates carbon was “leaking out” of the fossil, not moving into it.

Another study showed that fossil ammonites and wood from a lower Cretaceous formation, which is supposed to be 112-120 million years old, also have detectable levels of carbon-14 in them.

If these studies are accurate, they show that there is something wrong with the old-earth view: Either carbon dating is not the reliable tool it is thought to be for “recent” dating, or the fossils and materials that are supposed to be millions of years old are not really that old. While these studies use several different samples, they represent the work of only a few scientists.

Also, until there is some explanation for the trends in the data, such as the grouping I mentioned above, there is always the possibility of an alternative explanation.

Despite my caution, I can say two things for sure about these data.

More importantly, the data are obviously threatening to some old-earth scientists, as the talk has actually been removed from the meeting’s official program!

Tags: , ,